INFORMATION SECURITY AS A TOOL FOR RISK MANAGEMENT AND ACHIEVING INFORMATION DOMINANCE
Keywords:
information security; risk management; information dominance; IDRM; hybrid threats; behavioral risk; strategic governance; cybersecurity; NIS2; DORA; adaptive security; threat intelligence.Abstract
This study examines the transformation of information security from a technically oriented protective function into an integrated instrument for strategic risk management and the achievement of information dominance. In an environment characterized by increasing complexity, hybrid threats, and the growing role of information as a source of influence, traditional security and risk models are no longer sufficient to explain or manage contemporary organizational realities.
The paper advances the argument that risk should be understood as a dynamic, behavior-driven process, while information must be treated as a contextual resource with a dual nature—simultaneously an asset and a source of vulnerability. On this basis, the study introduces the Information Dominance Risk Model (IDRM), an integrated conceptual framework that synchronizes strategic governance, information value dynamics, actor behavior, and adaptive security architecture.
The model redefines the objective of security—from risk minimization to achieving a state of information dominance, in which organizations are capable of making faster, more accurate, and more resilient decisions under conditions of uncertainty. The structure of IDRM, consisting of seven interrelated layers, is presented alongside its applicability in business and regulatory contexts, including alignment with the NIS2 Directive and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The contribution of the study is threefold—conceptual, methodological, and practical—by integrating risk, information, and behavioral factors into a unified management model that transforms security from a defensive function into a source of strategic advantage.
References
1. ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Information Security Management Systems – Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
2. ISO 31000:2018. Risk Management – Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
3. NIST. Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (CSF 2.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2024.
4. NIST SP 800-30. Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
5. ENISA. Threat Landscape Report. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, latest editions.
6. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House.
7. Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. Random House.
8. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
9. European Union. Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2 Directive).
10. European Union. Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554.
11. Parker, D. B. (1998). Fighting Computer Crime. Wiley.
12. Bell, D. E., & LaPadula, L. J. (1973). Secure Computer Systems: Mathematical Foundations. MITRE Corporation.
13. Mitnick, K. (2002). The Art of Deception. Wiley.
14. Hutchins, E. M., Cloppert, M. J., & Amin, R. M. (2011). Intelligence-Driven Computer Network Defense. Lockheed Martin.
15. NATO. Allied Joint Doctrine for Information Operations (AJP-3.10).
16. World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report, latest editions.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Georgi Dimitrov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.