ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF THE ENERGY AND CLIMATE TRANSITION IN BULGARIA: REGIONAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Vesela Angelova UARD

Keywords:

energy transition, decarbonization, regional development, economic effects, sustainable development.

Abstract

The study analyzes the economic dimensions of the energy and climate transition in Bulgaria, focusing on regional differences, structural risks, and opportunities for sustainable development. The analysis examines the interrelationships between greenhouse gas emissions, the country's energy structure, European decarbonization policies, and their economic effects at the regional levelThe methodology is based on a comparative analysis of official European and national sources, including data on emissions by country and sector, EU regulatory frameworks, and environmental assessments by the European Environment Agency (European Parliament, 2024; European Environment Agency, 2025). A combined approach is applied, combining a quantitative comparison of emission profiles and a qualitative analysis of the economic consequences of climate policies.

The results show that Bulgaria is at a critical stage of energy transition, characterized by high dependence on carbon-intensive energy sources and significant territorial imbalances. Coal regions, in particular the Maritsa Basin, are characterised by increased economic vulnerability due to the concentration of employment and industrial production related to fossil fuels. European policies-including Fit for 55, the European Climate Law, the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS and ETS2), and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) - have a direct impact on production costs, industrial competitiveness and investment decisions, creating both economic risks and opportunities for technological modernisation and structural transformation.

An analysis of institutional practices based on environmental reports (Environmental Statement, 2024) shows that sustainable resource management-reducing energy consumption, switching to renewable electricity, improving waste management, and digitizing processes-leads to measurable savings and increased efficiency. Similar effects are observed in the agricultural sector, where the application of environmental and integrated approaches contributes to increased economic sustainability and more efficient use of natural resources (Pencheva, 2025a; Minkova et al., 2024). These approaches can be applied in Bulgarian public institutions and enterprises as a tool for simultaneously improving economic and environmental performance.

References

1.Pencheva, T. (2025a). The impact of pesticides on ecosystems and the role of biological control in sustainable agriculture. In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Knowledge, 2.Science, Innovation, Technologies” (July 11, 2025, Veliko Tarnovo, pp. 1108–1120). Institute of Knowledge, Science and Innovation. ISSN 2815-3480 (CD).

3.Pencheva, T. (2025b). Plant protection in vegetable crops: Integrated and ecological approaches to sustainable agriculture. In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Knowledge, Science, Innovation, Technologies” (July 11, 2025, Veliko Tarnovo, pp. 1099–1107). Institute of Knowledge, Science and Innovation. ISSN 2815-3480 (CD).

4.Pencheva, T. (2025c). Current status and prospects of greenhouse vegetable production in Bulgaria. In Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Knowledge, Science, Innovation, Technologies” (July 11, 2025, Veliko Tarnovo, pp. 1085–1098). Institute of Knowledge, Science and Innovation. ISSN 2815-3480 (CD).

5.European Investment Bank. (2024). Environmental statement 2024: Environmental performance and resource management. https://www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20240025_environmental_statement_2024_en.pdf

6.European Environment Agency. (2024). Circular economy country profile 2024: Bulgaria. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/circular-economy/country-profiles-on-circular-economy/circular-economy-country-profiles-2024/bulgaria_2024-ce-country-profile_final.pdf

7.European Environment Agency. (2025). Europe’s environment 2025: Bulgaria country profile. https://www.eea.europa.eu

8.European Parliament. (2025). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): Implementation and transition period. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_3088

9.Ilieva, T., Karova, A., & Ivanova, M. (2025). Sustainable agriculture through integrated pest management: Strategies for effective implementation. In E. G. Nathanail, N. Gavanas, & E. Adamos (Eds.), Climate crisis and resilient transportation systems (CSUM 2024) (pp. 511–520). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82818-8_38

10.Karova, A., & Ilieva-Pencheva, T. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for utilizing ecosystem services in the sustainable management of agroecosystems. Agricultural Sciences, 16(43, Suppl.), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.22620/agrisci.2024.43.025

11.Krastev, B., Petkov, P., Angelova, V., Angelov, S., & Nechev, T. (2023). The role of project financing for sustainable development of the green economy. INVEST4EXCELLENCE Project, University of Agribusiness and Rural Development. https://virtualcampus.invest-alliance.eu/docs/eoscrepo/ac9dc743-ea16-4b96-9ea7-a1f7ce0efedc.pdf

12.LRQA. (n.d.). CBAM and EU ETS2: What you need to know. https://www.lrqa.com/en/insights/articles/cbam-euets2/

13.Minkova, I., Karova, A., & Ilieva-Pencheva, T. (2024). Role of regulating ecosystem services in reducing the use of chemical pesticides. Agricultural Sciences, 16(43, Suppl.), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.22620/agrisci.2024.43.024

14.Yakimov, D., Plachkov, D., Dimitrova, S., & Arabska, E. (2025). Study on the possibilities for production of by-products from plant raw material. In Book of abstracts of the Slovak Economic Association Meeting (SEAM 2025) (pp. 39–40). https://slovakecon.sk/seam2025/abstracts.html

Published

2026-05-13