SUSTAINABLE SUCCESSION IN FAMILY ENTERPRISES: A THEORETICAL INTEGRATION OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM, ESG GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE FINANCE
Keywords:
stakeholder capitalism, sustainable finance, shareholder value, ESG, family business, socio emotional wealth, regional development, business succession.Abstract
The article examines the theoretical foundations and interactions between
stakeholder capitalism and sustainable finance in the context of family enterprises, regional
development and sustainable business transfer. The study aims to conceptualise how these two
paradigms jointly shape a model of corporate sustainability that supports intergenerational
continuity in family firms.
The research employs a qualitative, conceptual-analytical approach. It integrates a
systematic review of international academic literature, a comparative analysis of theoretical models,
synthesis of empirical findings from prior studies, and an interpretative examination of the
European regulatory framework, including the EU Taxonomy, SFDR and CSRD. The methodology
focuses on identifying conceptual linkages, complementarities and theoretical mechanisms relevant
to family business succession and sustainable corporate governance.
The analysis demonstrates that stakeholder capitalism expands the corporate focus beyond
shareholders to all stakeholder groups, reinforcing long-term value creation, trust and social
responsibility. Sustainable finance complements this paradigm by providing financial instruments,
regulatory standards and market mechanisms that channel capital towards sustainable activities,
reduce risk and enhance transparency. Family enterprises exhibit distinctive characteristics—
longterm orientation, strong identity, embeddedness in local communities and socio-emotional
wealth (SEW)—which make them natural carriers of stakeholder logic. ESG integration emerges as
a strategic tool that strengthens competitiveness, facilitates access to capital and supports succession
readiness. At the regional level, stakeholder capitalism enhances social capital and cooperation,
while sustainable finance drives green transformation and innovation. In the context of business
transfer, stakeholder relationships reduce organisational risk, and sustainable finance improves
financial resilience and firm value.
The study offers an integrated theoretical framework combining stakeholder capitalism and
sustainable finance, specifically tailored to the dynamics of family business succession. It
contributes to the literature by linking corporate sustainability, intergenerational continuity and
regional development. The findings provide conceptual foundations for future empirical research
and inform policy design aimed at strengthening sustainable governance and succession processes
in family enterprises.
References
1. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family
firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family
Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
2. European Commission. (2020). Sustainable corporate governance initiative. Brussels:
European Commission.
3. European Commission. (2021). Business transfer and succession in SMEs. Brussels:
European Commission.
4. European Investment Bank (EIB). (2022). Investment Report 2022/2023: Resilience and
renewal in Europe. Luxembourg: EIB.
5. European Union. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability‐related
disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
6. European Union. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework
to facilitate sustainable investment (EU Taxonomy).
7. European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 on corporate sustainability reporting
(CSRD).
8. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated
evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment,
5(4), 210–233.
9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
10. Mayer, C. (2018). Prosperity: Better business makes the greater good. Oxford
University Press.
11. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in
competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press.
12. OECD. (2020). OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2020: Sustainable and resilient
finance. Paris:
13. OECD Publishing.
14. OECD. (2021). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing.
15. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.
New York: Simon & Schuster.
16. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Gersick, K. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review:
Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25(1), 5–15.
17. Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms
investors, corporations, and the public. Berrett-Koehler.
18. Zellweger, T. (2017). Managing the family business: Theory and practice. Edward Elgar
Publishing.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 New knowledge Journal of science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.