SUSTAINABLE SUCCESSION IN FAMILY ENTERPRISES: A THEORETICAL INTEGRATION OF STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM, ESG GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE FINANCE

Authors

  • Velizar Petrov Regional Development Agency with Business Support Centre for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

Keywords:

stakeholder capitalism, sustainable finance, shareholder value, ESG, family business, socio emotional wealth, regional development, business succession.

Abstract

The article examines the theoretical foundations and interactions between

stakeholder capitalism and sustainable finance in the context of family enterprises, regional

development and sustainable business transfer. The study aims to conceptualise how these two

paradigms jointly shape a model of corporate sustainability that supports intergenerational

continuity in family firms.

The research employs a qualitative, conceptual-analytical approach. It integrates a

systematic review of international academic literature, a comparative analysis of theoretical models,

synthesis of empirical findings from prior studies, and an interpretative examination of the

European regulatory framework, including the EU Taxonomy, SFDR and CSRD. The methodology

focuses on identifying conceptual linkages, complementarities and theoretical mechanisms relevant

to family business succession and sustainable corporate governance.

The analysis demonstrates that stakeholder capitalism expands the corporate focus beyond

shareholders to all stakeholder groups, reinforcing long-term value creation, trust and social

responsibility. Sustainable finance complements this paradigm by providing financial instruments,

regulatory standards and market mechanisms that channel capital towards sustainable activities,

reduce risk and enhance transparency. Family enterprises exhibit distinctive characteristics—

longterm orientation, strong identity, embeddedness in local communities and socio-emotional

wealth (SEW)—which make them natural carriers of stakeholder logic. ESG integration emerges as

a strategic tool that strengthens competitiveness, facilitates access to capital and supports succession

readiness. At the regional level, stakeholder capitalism enhances social capital and cooperation,

while sustainable finance drives green transformation and innovation. In the context of business

transfer, stakeholder relationships reduce organisational risk, and sustainable finance improves

financial resilience and firm value.

The study offers an integrated theoretical framework combining stakeholder capitalism and

sustainable finance, specifically tailored to the dynamics of family business succession. It

contributes to the literature by linking corporate sustainability, intergenerational continuity and

regional development. The findings provide conceptual foundations for future empirical research

and inform policy design aimed at strengthening sustainable governance and succession processes

in family enterprises.

References

1. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family

firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family

Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.

2. European Commission. (2020). Sustainable corporate governance initiative. Brussels:

European Commission.

3. European Commission. (2021). Business transfer and succession in SMEs. Brussels:

European Commission.

4. European Investment Bank (EIB). (2022). Investment Report 2022/2023: Resilience and

renewal in Europe. Luxembourg: EIB.

5. European Union. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability‐related

disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).

6. European Union. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework

to facilitate sustainable investment (EU Taxonomy).

7. European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 on corporate sustainability reporting

(CSRD).

8. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated

evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment,

5(4), 210–233.

9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

10. Mayer, C. (2018). Prosperity: Better business makes the greater good. Oxford

University Press.

11. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in

competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press.

12. OECD. (2020). OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2020: Sustainable and resilient

finance. Paris:

13. OECD Publishing.

14. OECD. (2021). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing.

15. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.

New York: Simon & Schuster.

16. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Gersick, K. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review:

Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25(1), 5–15.

17. Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms

investors, corporations, and the public. Berrett-Koehler.

18. Zellweger, T. (2017). Managing the family business: Theory and practice. Edward Elgar

Publishing.

Published

2026-05-13