ECONOMIC NEGOTIATIONS IN THE DIGITAL ERA: DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED DIGITAL ECONOMIC NEGOTIATION FRAMEWORK BASED ON EIGHT GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
Keywords:
economic negotiations; digital transformation; artificial intelligence; big data analytics; digital trust; negotiation strategy; information asymmetry; technological adaptability; digital governance.Abstract
Digital transformation is reshaping economic negotiations by changing how information is generated, processed, and used in strategic decision-making. Traditional negotiation theories, focused mainly on bargaining power, information asymmetry, and interpersonal interaction, do not fully capture the complexity of technology-mediated economic exchanges. This paper develops the Integrated Digital Economic Negotiation Framework (IDENF), a conceptual model explaining how digital capabilities influence negotiation effectiveness in the global economy. Based on the literature on negotiation theory, digital transformation, artificial intelligence, and information economics, the study proposes eight principles of economic negotiations in a digitalized world: data intelligence, AI-augmented decision-making, digital trust, technological adaptability, digital transparency, ethical digital governance, networked collaboration, and continuous digital learning. The framework contributes to the literature by reconceptualizing economic negotiations as hybrid socio-technological processes where human expertise and digital infrastructures jointly shape negotiation outcomes.
Note: The article was elaborated within the framework of Subprogram 030101 „Strengthening the resilience, competitiveness, and sustainability of the economy of the Republic of Moldova in the context of the accession process to the European Union”, institutional funding.
References
1. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.
2. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716
3. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
4. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660.
5. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Competing in the Age of AI: Strategy and Leadership When Algorithms and Networks Run the World. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
6. Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. New York, NY: Free Press.
7. Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2021). Negotiation (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
8. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
9. McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60–68.
10. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
11. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
New knowledge Journal of science by Univesity of agribusiness and rural development is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://science.uard.bg/index.php/newknowledge/issue/archive.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://science.uard.bg/index.php/newknowledge/index.
